Prismmulti-framework research
Prism

See every stock through 15+ investor lenses. Research, decide, document — without leaving the page.

For research and education only — not investment advice.

Research
  • Browse
  • Screener
  • Markets
  • Superinvestors
  • Insider tracker
Tools
  • Backtest
  • Calculators
  • Compare
  • Copilot
Workspace
  • Portfolio
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Weekly digest
  • Learn
© 2026 Prism Finance. All data illustrative.GlossaryContact
  • Browse
  • Screener
  • Disagree
  • Portfolio
DNN logo

DNN

Denison Mines Corp.
EnergyUraniumUnclassified
$3.62 · 15min delay
β 1.65

A challenged mid-cap business trading at a premium valuation. Most frameworks reject it today.

Download report

52-wk low $1.3952-wk high $4.43

Mkt Cap

$3.27B

P/E

—

PEG

106.92

P/B

12.11

Dividend

—

ROE

-46.6%

About the business

Denison Mines Corp. engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of uranium bearing properties in Canada. It holds 95% interest in its flagship project Wheeler River uranium project located in the Athabasca Basin region in northern Saskatchewan. The company was formerly known as International Uranium Corporation and changed its name to Denison Mines Corp. in December 2006. The company was founded in 1954 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Who would buy DNN?

Consensus 0/100 · Aligned · Investors mostly agree.

0 0 15

Endorses

· 0 frameworks

No framework reaches a strong endorsement at current metrics.

Rejects

· 3 frameworks
  • Peter Lynch· Lynch GARP0/100

    PEG < 1 (growth at a discount) is 106.92× — fails "< 1.00×".

  • Warren Buffett· Buffett Quality0/100

    ROE > 15% is -46.6% — fails "> 15.0%".

Insider activity · Negative

Insider selling outweighs buying

Strength 70/100

9 insiders sold $4.5M on a discretionary basis. Discretionary selling carries more signal than planned disposals, but insiders sell for many non-thesis reasons (taxes, diversification, life events) — do not over-read it.

In Prism's context

Insider selling is worth flagging but insiders sell for many non-thesis reasons. Read alongside the framework verdict (Fails criteria).

InsiderRoleTypeDateSharesAvg priceValueOwn
Traub (Jennifer June)Director of IssuerOption exerciseMar 24, 2026147,000$1.04$153KDirect
Traub (Jennifer June)Director of IssuerOpen-market sellMar 24, 202676,281$3.43$262KDirect
Cates (David Daniel CPA)Director of IssuerOption exerciseJan 30, 2026120,000$1.92$230KDirect
Cates (David Daniel CPA)Director of IssuerOption exerciseJan 30, 2026240,000$1.09$263KDirect
Smith, Mary JoanneSenior Officer of IssuerTransactionJan 29, 202610,000——Direct
Smith, Mary JoanneSenior Officer of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 29, 202610,000$4.35$43KDirect
Smith, Mary JoanneSenior Officer of IssuerTransactionJan 28, 20265,000——Direct
Smith, Mary JoanneSenior Officer of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 28, 20265,000$4.18$21KDirect
Cates (David Daniel CPA)Director of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 28, 2026360,000$4.29$1.55MDirect
Neuburger, David MarkDirector of IssuerOption exerciseJan 26, 202669,500$1.04$72KDirect
Neuburger, David MarkDirector of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 26, 202669,500$3.96$275KDirect
Neuburger, David MarkDirector of IssuerOption exerciseJan 22, 20264,000$1.04$4KDirect
Neuburger, David MarkDirector of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 22, 20264,000$3.92$16KDirect
Sidle (Elizabeth)Senior Officer of IssuerOption exerciseJan 22, 202665,334$1.08$71KDirect
Sidle (Elizabeth)Senior Officer of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 22, 202632,334$3.90$126KDirect
Sidle (Elizabeth)Senior Officer of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 19, 2026747$3.74$3KDirect
Sorba (Chad)Senior Officer of IssuerOption exerciseJan 19, 202613,000$1.33$17KDirect
Sorba (Chad)Senior Officer of IssuerOption exerciseJan 19, 202622,666$1.07$24KDirect
Sorba (Chad)Senior Officer of IssuerOption exerciseJan 19, 202624,000$1.88$45KDirect
Sorba (Chad)Senior Officer of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 19, 202659,666$3.74$223KDirect
Switzer (Janna)Senior Officer of IssuerOption exerciseJan 19, 202630,000$0.91$27KDirect
Switzer (Janna)Senior Officer of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 19, 202630,000$3.71$111KDirect
Willett (Amanda)Senior Officer of IssuerOption exerciseJan 19, 202629,667$1.88$56KDirect
Willett (Amanda)Senior Officer of IssuerOption exerciseJan 19, 202627,000$1.33$36KDirect
Willett (Amanda)Senior Officer of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 19, 202656,667$3.66$207KDirect
Cates (David Daniel CPA)Director of IssuerOption exerciseJan 16, 2026315,000$1.32$416KDirect
Sidle (Elizabeth)Senior Officer of IssuerOption exerciseJan 16, 202669,000$1.32$91KDirect
Sidle (Elizabeth)Senior Officer of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 16, 202664,000$3.49$224KDirect
Cates (David Daniel CPA)Director of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 14, 2026315,000$3.47$1.09MDirect
Smith, Mary JoanneSenior Officer of IssuerOption exerciseJan 14, 202621,667$1.88$41KDirect
Smith, Mary JoanneSenior Officer of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 14, 202621,667$3.50$76KDirect
Sterritt (Laurie)Director of IssuerOption exerciseJan 2, 202656,000$1.34$75KDirect
Sterritt (Laurie)Director of IssuerOption exerciseJan 2, 202640,000$1.09$43KDirect
Sterritt (Laurie)Director of IssuerOpen-market sellJan 2, 202696,000$2.98$287KDirect

Insider activity from Yahoo Finance (quoteSummary: insiderTransactions + netSharePurchaseActivity). Cached 6 hours. · Insiders hold 0.3% of shares outstanding.

Net 6M: +0 sh

Price history

—
Loading…

Drag across the chart to select a custom period — all analysis below refocuses to that window.

What this means: A significant rerating — the valuation-sensitive frameworks below will have tightened since this move.

Premium view

AI summaries

Members get a plain-English 'what matters now' brief plus an explanation of why the price is moving, grounded in Prism's framework scores.

Premium view

Full framework decision report

See how Lynch, Buffett, Graham, Greenblatt, Fisher and more each score this stock — with every rule, threshold, and reason exposed.

Premium view

Peer comparison + AI read-through

See how this stock stacks up against its closest peers on valuation, growth, and returns — with a written peer summary.

What would DNN do to your portfolio?

Add Denison Mines Corp. at a hypothetical weight and Prism recalculates your whole book:

Risk metrics

Sharpe, Sortino, volatility, max drawdown, beta — before and after.

Sector concentration

How much this shifts your top sector weight and overall diversification.

Archetype tilt

Whether this leans your book more toward Quality, Value, Growth, Deep Value, Income, or Momentum.

DNN is currently tagged:Fails criteria (0/100)

Portfolio analytics are part of the member experience.

Sign in to run this simulation
Probabilistic recommendation· rec-v1.0.0-2026-04

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

DNN: 40% estimated probability of outperforming over the next 12M window. 0 of 6 signal families negative (low confidence). Main risk to monitor: 1111% above fair value.

Outperform prob.
40%
vs S&P 500 · 12M
low confidence
Expected return
-12.5% → +23.5%
mid +5.5% / yr
Downside (p20)
-19.8%
stress -39.6%
Data quality
75/100
Good
Prism Score

Probabilistic research output, not financial advice. Prism recommendations are based on available data, historical relationships, and model assumptions. They do not guarantee future returns. Conduct independent due diligence before any investment decision.

Backtested and similar-setup statistics may be affected by survivorship bias, look-ahead bias, overfitting, transaction costs, liquidity constraints, and data limitations. Probability estimates are anchored heuristics — not validated forecasts — until the walk-forward backtest pipeline is in place.

Prism Score

Composite 27/100. Strongest contribution from ownership; weakest from quality.

Composite
27
/ 100
Avoid
Deep valueval.
13/ 100

P/B 12.11× · FCF yield -2.4%

Margin of safetyval.
0/ 100

1111% above fair value

Bull · base · bear scenarios

Three plausible paths over a 5-year horizon.

Indicative only. Probabilities are model-implied weights for stress-testing — not forecasts.

Bull
~20%
$0.39
-36.0% / yr (5y)

A turnaround takes hold: margin recovers toward peer averages, revenue stabilises, and the market re-prices the asset value rather than the running earnings.

Drivers
  • • Margin expands by 200–400 bps from -1553%
  • • Stranded asset value crystallises
  • • Multiple re-rates one full turn higher
Base
~45%
$0.30
-39.3% / yr (5y)

No deterioration, no surprise re-acceleration. -1553% operating margin and 4% top-line growth chug along; the multiple slowly converges to the central fair-value estimate.

Global value comparison

Denison Mines Corp. vs sector medians — GCC, MENA, and Global ex-US.

Sector: Energy. MENA-aware investors can sanity-check whether the US name is offering value relative to regional peers.

MetricDNNGCC medianMENA medianGlobal ex-US
P/E (TTM)—14.8×—9.0×
P/B12.11×2.60×—1.20×
Dividend yield—5.20%—5.50%
ROE-46.6%
Earnings reaction explainer

DNN missed materially — -56.4% below consensus.

Big miss· -56.4%

Reported EPS $-0.03 vs $-0.02 expected — a material miss. The bar of the next two prints will be lower, but the multiple that was bid up to today's level usually does not survive an unexplained shortfall this size. Trailing operating margin: -1552.7%.

  • Quality investorsNegative

    A material miss is incompatible with a quality-compounder narrative until proven otherwise. Two more prints needed before that label is restored.

  • Growth investorsNegative

    Multiple compression typically follows. The risk is not the miss itself, it's that consensus needs to re-rate forward estimates lower.

  • Value investorsNegative

    Even cheap stocks get cheaper after this kind of print — wait for capitulation rather than catching the falling knife.

News & events

Next earnings

Tue, May 12 · consensus EPS $-0.02 · last actual $-0.03

  • DNN Stock Trades at Premium Value: Should You Buy, Hold or Sell?

    Zacks · just now

  • Is Denison Mine Corp (DNN) Stock Outpacing Its Basic Materials Peers This Year?

    Zacks · just now

  • Should DNN Stock be in Your Portfolio Before Q1 Earnings?

    Zacks · just now

Key Metrics at a Glance

P/E Ratio (TTM)

N/A

PEG Ratio

106.92

P/B Ratio

12.11

EPS Growth

N/A

Revenue Growth

4.4%

Debt / Equity

1.67

Net Cash / Share

$-0.08

Return on Equity

-46.6%

Gross Margin

-15.1%

Operating Margin

-1552.7%

FCF / Share

$-0.09

Current Ratio

10.75

Joel Greenblatt· Magic Formula0/100

ROE > 20% is -46.6% — fails "> 20.0%".

See the full rule-by-rule drill-down below
27/100
Low agreement
Signal families · 0 of 6 signal families negative
Agreement: Low
  • Valuationnegative

    Trades meaningfully above the fair-value range — limited margin of safety.

    1111% above fair value
    25
    /100
  • Qualitynegative

    Returns are sub-cost-of-capital; quality bar not met.

    ROE -47% (weak)Op margin -1553% (thin)
    24
    /100
  • Balance sheetnegative

    Leverage is high relative to coverage — balance-sheet risk on the table.

    D/E 1.67 (heavy)CR 10.75Thin interest coverage
    34
    /100
  • Momentumneutral

    Price trend is unremarkable — neither tailwind nor headwind.

    73% through 52w rangeβ 1.65 (elevated)
    55
    /100
  • Behaviouralneutral

    Behavioural read is mixed — some accumulation, some distribution.

    Net insider selling ($5.7M)1 tracked holders · peak 24.1%
    42
    /100
  • Catalysts & eventsnegative

    Recent miss and / or risk patterns weigh on the catalyst path.

    Big EPS miss (-56%)
    36
    /100
Positive drivers

No positive drivers identified.

Key risks
  • • 1111% above fair value
  • • ROE -47% (weak)
  • • Op margin -1553% (thin)
  • • D/E 1.67 (heavy)
  • • CR 10.75
Suggested diligence questions
  • 1. What would invalidate the thesis if it appeared in the next earnings print?
Similar historical setups[MOCK DATA]

Among 89 historical setups with similar Prism Score and signal-agreement profiles, 42% beat the benchmark over the next 12 months, with average excess return of -4.1% / yr.

Probabilistic research output — not financial advice.
View full thesis
Quality20%
0/ 100

ROE -47% · Op margin -1553%

Balance sheet15%
71/ 100

D/E 1.67 · CR 10.75

Insider convictionown.
25/ 100

Net selling — 9 insiders

Superinvestorown.
79/ 100

1 tracked holder · peak 24.1%

Shareholder yield10%
25/ 100

Buyback runway via FCF

Momentum5%
79/ 100

73% through 52w range

Growth5%
51/ 100

EPS — · Rev 4%

Designed to surface potentially attractive characteristics — descriptive, not prescriptive. For research and educational purposes only.

Customise weights
Drivers
  • • Revenue growth holds near 4%
  • • Operating margin stays around -1553%
  • • No major balance-sheet surprises
Bear
~35%
$0.22
-42.7% / yr (5y)

Already-thin margins compress further on input-cost or pricing pressure; revenue softens; the market questions whether the current earnings power is structural or one-off. Multi-year drawdown plausible.

Drivers
  • • Operating margin compresses 200–400 bps
  • • Refinancing at higher rates pressures interest coverage
  • • Sentiment de-rates the name to a deeper-value multiple
Indicative weights
18.0%
—
13.0%

Editorial dataset · as of 2024-12-31. Sector medians are hand-maintained from public Tadawul / ADX / DFM / QSE / EGX disclosures and indicative Global ex-US references. Live licensed data is on the roadmap. For research and educational purposes only.

What to watch on the next print
  • • Management explanation of cause — one-off vs structural
  • • Analyst-revision direction over the next 1-2 weeks
  • • Interest coverage and debt maturity wall
  • Ivanhoe Electric (IE) Reports Q1 Loss, Lags Revenue Estimates

    Zacks · just now

  • Cosa Reports Anomalous Uranium in Sandstone at Darby Joint Venture with Denison Mines

    TMX Newsfile · just now

  • Intrepid Potash (IPI) Q1 Earnings Surpass Estimates

    Zacks · just now

  • Institutional Own.

    61.7%

    Insider Own.

    0.3%

    Dividend Yield

    N/A

    Book Value / Share

    $0.30

    Superinvestor ownership

    Held by 1 tracked superinvestor · peak weight 4.1%

    Grand Portfolio
    • Murray Stahl

      Horizon Kinetics · Q4 2025

      4.1%

    Weights reflect each investor's latest 13F or factsheet snapshot. Data lags real time by 45+ days.