Conventional feeds reward consensus. This one rewards contention — names where Buffett, Lynch, Greenblatt, Klarman and the rest see different stocks. The further apart the frameworks, the more there is to learn.Polarization-sorted from a curated universe of 20. 3 consensus names filtered out. Updated 5/12/2026, 1:59:43 PM.
$220.33Prism 69/100Trim
Frameworks split on whether the cycle is closer to peak or trough. Earnings power varies meaningfully across the cycle — read the multiple in that context.
$386.65Prism 71/100Trim
Warren Buffett and Joel Greenblatt like the business quality, but Fama / French and Walter Schloss reject the current valuation. Resolution depends on whether the quality keeps compounding faster than the multiple compresses.
$294.14Prism 62/100Trim
Joel Greenblatt and AQR / Asness like the business quality, but Walter Schloss and Seth Klarman reject the current valuation. Resolution depends on whether the quality keeps compounding faster than the multiple compresses.
$408.06Prism 70/100Trim
Warren Buffett and Joel Greenblatt like the business quality, but Fama / French and Benjamin Graham reject the current valuation. Resolution depends on whether the quality keeps compounding faster than the multiple compresses.
$600.07Prism 79/100Watch
Warren Buffett and Joel Greenblatt like the business quality, but Fama / French and Benjamin Graham reject the current valuation. Resolution depends on whether the quality keeps compounding faster than the multiple compresses.
$124.20Prism 78/100Buy
Benjamin Graham and Seth Klarman see deep value in a beaten-down name, but Walter Schloss and Joel Greenblatt reject the deteriorating quality. Resolution hinges on whether the asset value is real or shrinking.
$481.72Prism 77/100Buy
Benjamin Graham and Howard Marks see deep value in a beaten-down name, but Joel Greenblatt and Warren Buffett reject the deteriorating quality. Resolution hinges on whether the asset value is real or shrinking.
$78.87Prism 65/100Trim
Joel Greenblatt and Warren Buffett like the business quality, but Seth Klarman and Benjamin Graham reject the current valuation. Resolution depends on whether the quality keeps compounding faster than the multiple compresses.
$143.78Prism 64/100Trim
Joel Greenblatt and AQR / Asness like the business quality, but Peter Lynch and Walter Schloss reject the current valuation. Resolution depends on whether the quality keeps compounding faster than the multiple compresses.
$224.00Prism 51/100Avoid
Dividend Growth School and AQR / Asness like the business quality, but Peter Lynch and Walter Schloss reject the current valuation. Resolution depends on whether the quality keeps compounding faster than the multiple compresses.
$73.33Prism 68/100Watch
Frameworks split on whether the cycle is closer to peak or trough. Earnings power varies meaningfully across the cycle — read the multiple in that context.
$221.43Prism 62/100Watch
Frameworks split on whether the cycle is closer to peak or trough. Earnings power varies meaningfully across the cycle — read the multiple in that context.
When Buffett's, Lynch's, Greenblatt's, Klarman's and Schloss's rules agree on a stock, you learn nothing — every framework is reading the same signal the same way. When they disagree, each side has spotted something the others missed. That's where real research pays off.
No other tool can produce this list, because no other tool runs N independent investor frameworks side-by-side and exposes the spread.
For research and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decision.