~6 seconds. We show the steps in real time so you can see where the verdict comes from. If a step fails, you see which one — not a generic error.
This is a real Prism memo. The same engine runs for any ticker once you sign in. The six demos below were chosen to illustrate the format across investment styles — they are not curated for performance. They include names Prism rates well, names it rates poorly, and names where it sees a mixed read.
Free accounts get unlimited sample tickers. Plus and Pro unlock alerts, exports, custom strategies, and saved memos.
For research and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decision.
William O'Neil's lens fits best (score 67/100).
Balance sheet — D/E 0.36 · current ratio 2.31
Valuation — Trades -413% above central fair value of $22.88
William O'Neil's lens fits best (score 67/100). Valuation reads as very expensive vs the central fair-value of $22.88. Prism scorecard overall: 43/100 (D). Price has run ahead of the fundamentals — consider trimming, not adding.
For this Trim to be wrong: Balance sheet grade is strong AND Momentum grade is strong would have to be the right reading instead.
4 frameworks reject this name with no real endorsers. When the disagreement disappears in this direction, the case to dig deeper for an idiosyncratic edge is usually weak.
No clear endorsers across the framework set.
Closing the gap on Revenue Growth > 20% and ROE > 17% would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on Positive FCF (covers dividend) and ROE > 10% would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on P/B < 1.0 (below book) and P/B < 0.7 (deep discount) would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on Net Cash Positive and Positive FCF would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on Down > 30% from 52-wk high and Near 52-wk low (< 20% up) would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on P/B < 1.5 and Positive earnings would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on Revenue Growth > 15% and Operating Margin > 15% would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on ROE > 20% and Operating Margin > 15% would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on FCF Yield > 7% and Net Cash > 0 would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on Net Cash Positive (NCAV proxy) and P/B < 0.8 would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on ROE > 15% and ROE > 20% (wide-moat signal) would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on PEG < 1 (growth at a discount) and Net Cash positive would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on ROE > 20% and ROE > 30% (elite) would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on ROE > 25% (elite) and Gross Margin > 50% would shift this lens toward a pass.
Closing the gap on P/B < 1.5 and FCF Yield > 5% would shift this lens toward a pass.
Splits like the one above are the point.See the Disagree Better feed →
Best suited for William O'Neil (Momentum / CAN SLIM)
Today: $117.51 — +0% vs central, outside the range.
Pattern-matched against value, quality, yield, momentum, leverage and accounting traps.
The current metrics don't match any of the modelled failure modes. This is a clean read — but qualitative risks (competition, regulation, key-person) are not captured here.
No named failure-modes triggered by the current metrics. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence — qualitative risks (competition, regulation, key-person) are not modelled here.
Final read: Trim. 0 of 15 investor lenses endorse this name; 11 reject it outright. No major mistake patterns flagged. Valuation: very expensive at $117.51 vs $22.88 fair value.